A young lad with just one goal in mind: to use lightning as a source of energy. But Twan wanted too much and wanted it too fast, just like others in society. He lost sight of the risks and dangers, which eventually led to his horrific death.
Twan was a fictional character which was designed to illustrate to us and today’s society that the way in which we treat each other now should not become the standard.
We like to believe. So much so that we choose to believe in something faster than we should. If we would take a step back and think about what can go wrong, then we shall see the possible dangers.
Artist impression of a working Lightning to Powerconverter
Artist impression of Lightning to Power Converter farm, a place where multiple generated lightning strikes produce energy and be converted to usable energy.
Why dit the lightning strikes stop at the border of Groningen?
In contemporary society, we ‘people’ are spoiled by the speed of events. All techniques are becoming faster and it’s the heyday of globalization. That speed lets us yearn to all that is possible, but it also makes us aware of what we are as a society. Just think about youth unemployment, the immigration issue, global terrorism et cetera. Because of this speed, people want these problems to be solved immediately, despite the consequences.
With this hoax, I try to show that speed isn’t always positive. In our quest to always be faster, we don’t see the faults and consequences anymore. The dangers in our society run the risk of becoming issues which we ‘store’ to deal with later. When it has gone completely wrong, society will look at these issues and say ‘if only…, where did it go wrong?’
Before we make a choice, however big or small, first think carefully about what the consequences might be. Not only for yourself, but also for the future generations.
Let Twan Bolderman be a lesson, before it is too late.
Last test my LTPC broke and sliced my knee. A part of the shale broke down after a short-circuit of the mechanism. Biggest problem is that I my LTPC is broken and fixing it will be very costly.
To get more investors behind my project I used an older version to show the full potential of my Lightning to Power Converter. What I did was mounting the older smaller version into my backpack and used the antenna from my last test. If a lightning strike hits, I would be able to power my phone or laptop in my backpack!
After two years of research I can finally say that I had a working prototype! Last Friday evening I did my second prototype test. Where with the first test the weather wasn’t in my favour, the second test the weather was just right.
I lit up the balloon with the copper wire attached to it and was able to get a triggered lightning strike after 40 minutes. My Lightning to Power Converter was able to extract 8 ampere out of the strike with a voltage of 40, which comes down at about 300 watts. I know that it doesn’t sound big, you can probably run your washing machine for half a wash, but it is a very nice beginning.
The main goal of these first test was to see how many Watt my LTPC was able to convert from one lightning strike. To take my LTPC one step further I’m going to connect it to the closed power grid of my parents house, they are on holiday so they won’t even notice. I will do the test a usual and hope to able to power a part of my house out of one lightning strike. I will be testing it tonight (Monday 12th of June) if the weather conditions are favourable.
My successful prototype test got a bit of attention in the Dutch media:
Damm, what a week it has been. As you may have read in my previous blogs / tweets, I had planned this week to go to four different cities to measure the electric current in the air. So that I could find a good spot to test my Lightning to Power Converter. But also check if my measurement matched my hypothesis that some places have more electrical activity than others.
I built a device that could measure the positive and negative current in the air through copper wire and a couple of sensors. Beside that the tool I built was heavy (30 kilo or more) it also wasn’t very stable. I would have hoped to measure at a minimum hight of 3 meters above the ground. But when I lifted my tool it snaps halfway.
First I did my measurements in Breda, as you can see in the video above shot by a acquaintance of me. People looked very weird at me, I think that they don’t understand what hard work science can be. It is very underestimated among people who aren’t in the scene.
Then I went on to go to Amsterdam. All went well, till I wanted to travel back home. If you follow me on Twitter or Instagram you may no where this is heading to. I don’t have a car and traveling with a bike to Amsterdam from Breda is a bit far, so I chose to travel with train instead. When I was nearly home the train stared to smell very weird and smoke was coming from the rear. The train conductors where a bit panicked and ran to the back of the train to get people out of there. Wasn’t really sure what was going on, the only thing I knew was that the weren’t really happy with my travel gear to say the least.
There was an emergency brake in the middle of god knows where and we all had to leave the train as fast a possible. As you may know my gear was in its most transportable way 2 x 1 meters, had sharp edges and swell out into the hallways. So in the heat of the moment I was able to rip some sensor out and left my stuff in between seats.
Had to leave my gear in between seats 😦
When outside of the train the fire department came to check the train and in the end deport us from the train track. With all the trouble it took me almost 3 hours to travel a distance that normally takes one hour. But in the end I managed to take a beautiful picture of the sunset on a place most people won’t come!
Puntje bij paaltje (as we say in the Dutch) I’m still looking for a good spot to test my first LTPC prototype. But I’m very confident that when I find the perfect location, my prototype will work!
Last Wednesday I had a live video on my Facebook and Twitter. If you missed it, you can watch the time-lapse above this blog or go to my Facebook (link) to watch the whole two-hour live video.
During this live video I looked at weather maps of the Netherlands that displayed the lightning strikes that happened between the period of 2004 and 2008. In total I looked and compared 4 places on 500 different lightning maps. The places that I looked at in particular where Breda, Eindhoven, Amsterdam and Groningen.
The result of my research concluded that during the period of 2004 and 2008 those 4 places had a very different lightning ratio. During those 1.461 days there where over 500 days where there where more than 10 lightning strikes in the Netherlands.
The results per city where as followed:
Breda: ±120 days
Eindhoven: ±74 days
Amsterdam: ±58 days
Groningen: ±35 days
These differences are very big and to make my hypothesis more convincing, I’m going to test the amount of positive and negative particles in the air in those different places. I will be starting in Breda and hope to expand to different cities very soon.
If you want to be kept up to date, make sure to subscribe on my blog. Or follow me on my Facebook, Twitter and Instagram!
With great proud I can announce that the patent for the lightning to power converter is pending! I’ve worked day and night to get to the point where I’m standing now. With this milestone I will be able to test my converter and show everyone that lightning is the power source of the future!
Why dit the lightning strikes stop at the border of Groningen?
No lightning in the north of Groningen, again.
Almost the whole of the Netherlands is covered, except Groningen off course! Why…
Four places that have a very peculiar lightning strike pattern!
Just a small update of what I’m currently working on. I’ve found some interesting reports while doing some location research for the wiring test. I’ve looked at lightning strikes in the Netherlands in May 2004 till 2017, and some peculiar details came up.
I have found out that in these last 13 years, when there where lightning strikes in The Netherlands, they almost always striked near the same places. Why that is the case I’m not really sure. I’ve looked at wind on different levels, humidity, temperature and water currents. But I wasn’t able to pinpoint the exact reason why it happened on those places.
One place got me most interested. From 2004 till 2017 there was a place in The Netherlands that almost never got hit in May. In the north of The Netherlands (Groningen) there is a place that was only hit twice in this period. Even when there where severer thunderstorms near that location, that placed got spared.
To be absolutely sure that it isn’t a coincidence, I’m going to spit through all months from 2004 till 2017 to find out if it is recurring. Because it is a lot of data (5000+ lighting maps), I could use some help! Please send me a message via Twitter / Facebook or email, there will be beer and pizza!